Economics ; Queen no more?

Economic studies are probably known for their famous set of assumptions, such as “rational” human beings, to decode activities and issues in the world. Following such assumptions will necessary make the studies “accurate” in academic sense but often not so in reality. This is usually due to the distance between the Economic perspective and the complex, inter-connected nature of the real world situations. (Earth might be an ideal world for Economics, but in a parallel universe)

Unlike Natural Sciences, which often have “observable truths” similar to the “theoretical truths” , a particular social science alone will not be sufficient to understand and explain an observation or an issue eg. why people are poor, in its entirety.

“the general or prevailing opinion in any subject is rarely or never the whole truth; it is only by the collision of adverse opinions that the remainder of the truth has any chance of being supplied”

― John Stuart Mill, On Liberty

Therefore to better comprehend the world, different perspectives and ideas from multiple social sciences will be required. If that is the case, how does Economic research fair? Are they open to use the views of other social sciences? Data from Microsoft Academics might contain some insights.

Band of Social Science (Queens)

The set of Social Sciences that were selected for the analysis, along with Economics, are Sociology, Political Science, Psychology, History and Geography. These subjects are now often integrated to individual study areas such as Political Economics, Behavioral Economics and Social Psychology , therefore it may possible to use multiple subjects ag with a main focus of a study to analyze a research question.

The analysis was conducted based on the two percentages, Research only mention the particular subject and Multidisciplinary research, as proxies for Openness of a field and the results are as follows :

As it appears, Economics is somewhat less integrated with other subjects in terms of research studies. Despite the initial judgment as a weakness, this can also be taken as a possible opportunity for the Researchers, specially Economists, to observe the study questions through multiple perspectives, and possible uncover valuable insights that would otherwise not be possible by using only Economic theories. And if required, best place(s) to understand some “best practices” would be Sociology and Political Science studies, with their higher multidisciplinary studies percentages.

If being the Queen of Social Sciences means collaborating with peer subjects to better understand the “whole truth”, as per JS Mill , then it seems like Economics have lost the crown and not just one, but two queens hail in the land of Social Science Research.

Originally published at




An Economic Undergraduate that is curious about everything else

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Who Killed Unemployment Insurance?

Can I get your number? When and when not to trust complete strangers, or economists

Payments Ecosystem Part 2: Banks

COVID-19 [May] Update: Impact on construction projects

COVID-19 [May] Update: Impact on construction projects

In Q1, the Saudi Arabian hotel market outperformed the rest of the GCC in terms of RevPAR…

If you had a million dollars

Government Budgeting and Economic Development in Iraq

BEER Approach to Stocks and Bonds in Nigeria

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Ashen Hirantha

Ashen Hirantha

An Economic Undergraduate that is curious about everything else

More from Medium

How To Stop Smoking — Cold Turkey!

SNF Preview: Packers Take on Cousins-less Vikings at Lambeau

Memorable Mother’s Day Gift Ideas

How will you find out how life works?